Small-Scale Two-Stroke
Compression Ignition Engine
Mechanical Design A: Upper Second Class
Team Size: 3 Mechanical Engineers
My Responsibilities: CAD (Fusion 360), CAM & Machining Simulations (Fusion360), Manufacturing Report (DFM and Assembly Operations Sequence), Machining Simulations (Fusion360), Material Selections (Granta Edupack), Calculations on Porting and Port Arrangements, and Engineering Drawings.
2nd Year Mechanical Engineering
2022
The approach in this project is to design a small-scaled two-stroke, compression
ignition engine for use in an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to be used for
exploration missions.
The engine must
power for at least 15 minutes
of flight, with 0.06 mhp at a
speed of approximately
12,000 rpm.
This would then be scaled up to produce 50,000 units.
This project offered me a thorough perspective on the importance of cost, safety, and performance in engineering design.
Rendered Engine Design
Scroll for Overview of Each Section
BRIEF OVERVIEW
Design
Assembly drawings of the Engine
Overall Dimensions
Section Views
Annotated Drawing
Dimensions for Intake, Exhaust, and Transfer Ports
Drawings of Piston Heights for Various Port Openings
1. Drawing of piston height during intake port openings and closings (when crank is at 45° and
135°).
2. Drawing of piston height when the
exhaust port opens and closes (when crank is at 205° and 335°).
3. Drawing of piston height when the transfer port opens and closes (when crank is at 125° and 325°).
Several
design changes were made throughout the project, including changing the diameter
of the shafts, in order to integrate more standard parts into the engine. The
non-standard components are mainly manufactured using sand casting as a primary
process and a combination of mostly turning, milling and drilling as secondary
processes. Specifically, the engine casing would be sand casted, heat treated, then
milled and drilled. For the assembly of the engine, sub-assemblies involving the
cylinder head, piston and crankshaft and the carburettor would be made. These
would then be generally assembled, with standard screws used to fix the parts
together. The materials chosen for the parts were carefully selected using the Granta
Edupack 2021 software and a documented step-by-step process was carried out for
the piston. This involved finding the property constraints of the part and screening
candidate materials to fit the requirements. A material index was used to limit the
mass of the part. The final material chosen was cast iron which would be sourced
locally. An eco analysis was carried out on the cast iron piston, with cast iron being
compared to stainless steel. In the part life, cast iron was more sustainable as it
consumed less energy and released less CO2
.
Design Validation
Basic Engine Parameters
A bore-stroke ratio of 0.9 were chosen, while the engine displacement were determined as 6.4 mm, the swept volume of the piston chamber was 706 mm3. The operating compression ratio of the engine is 16:1, and 8:1 for its starting postion, hence h1 and h2 were calculated as 0.6 mm and 1.3 mm respectively.
Component Manufacturing
Overall process plan for all nonstandard components:
Material Screening
The final candidates for types of materials’ properties were then compared as shown. All the groups have similar thermal conductivities. Cast iron was chosen
due to its significantly lower price than the other groups, despite it having a lower
fatigue strength than the others.
Machining of a Piston
Part Drawing of a Piston