Small-Scale Two-Stroke Compression Ignition Engine


Mechanical Design A: Upper Second Class
Team Size: 3 Mechanical Engineers
My Responsibilities: CAD (Fusion 360), CAM & Machining Simulations (Fusion360), Manufacturing Report (DFM and Assembly Operations Sequence), Machining Simulations (Fusion360), Material Selections (Granta Edupack), Calculations on Porting and Port Arrangements, and Engineering Drawings.
2nd Year Mechanical Engineering
2022



The approach in this project is to design a small-scaled two-stroke, compression ignition engine for use in an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to be used for exploration missions.  The engine must power for at least 15 minutes of flight, with 0.06 mhp at a speed of approximately 12,000 rpm. This would then be scaled up to produce 50,000 units. 

This project offered me a thorough perspective on the importance of cost, safety, and performance in engineering design.

Rendered Engine Design






Scroll for Overview of Each Section





BRIEF OVERVIEW



Design


Assembly drawings of the Engine


Overall Dimensions
Section Views

Annotated Drawing
Dimensions for Intake, Exhaust, and Transfer Ports




Drawings of Piston Heights for Various Port Openings



1. Drawing of piston height during intake port openings and closings (when crank is at 45° and 135°).
2. Drawing of piston height when the exhaust port opens and closes (when crank is at 205° and 335°).
3. Drawing of piston height when the transfer port opens and closes (when crank is at 125° and 325°).




Several design changes were made throughout the project, including changing the diameter of the shafts, in order to integrate more standard parts into the engine. The non-standard components are mainly manufactured using sand casting as a primary process and a combination of mostly turning, milling and drilling as secondary processes. Specifically, the engine casing would be sand casted, heat treated, then milled and drilled. For the assembly of the engine, sub-assemblies involving the cylinder head, piston and crankshaft and the carburettor would be made. These would then be generally assembled, with standard screws used to fix the parts together. The materials chosen for the parts were carefully selected using the Granta Edupack 2021 software and a documented step-by-step process was carried out for the piston. This involved finding the property constraints of the part and screening candidate materials to fit the requirements. A material index was used to limit the mass of the part. The final material chosen was cast iron which would be sourced locally. An eco analysis was carried out on the cast iron piston, with cast iron being compared to stainless steel. In the part life, cast iron was more sustainable as it consumed less energy and released less CO2 .






Design Validation


Basic Engine Parameters




A bore-stroke ratio of 0.9 were chosen, while the engine displacement were determined as 6.4 mm, the swept volume of the piston chamber was 706 mm3. The operating compression ratio of the engine is 16:1, and 8:1 for its starting postion, hence h1 and h2 were calculated as 0.6 mm and 1.3 mm respectively. 





Component Manufacturing


Overall process plan for all nonstandard components:



Material Screening




The final candidates for types of materials’ properties were then compared as shown. All the groups have similar thermal conductivities. Cast iron was chosen due to its significantly lower price than the other groups, despite it having a lower fatigue strength than the others.






Machining of a Piston







Part Drawing of a Piston













Contact and Links

Email
LinkedIn
Portfolio PDF
Resume/CV
Note

I am completing my final year at Imperial College London as a master’s student in Sep 2025, and I am now looking for a job in the engineering sector to begin in 2025. Please reach out if you would like to know more about me, or just to connect and discuss more in an online coffee chat!
© 2020-2024 Ching Hang Ng, All Rights Reserved